,

Waterhemp Now a Manitoba Weed

Can you identify the plants in the two pots below?

waterhemp-and-redroot-pigweed

The plants on the right are redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus); the plants on the left are waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus).

Unfortunately, the need to distinguish between these closely related weed species has become a reality for Manitoba producers and agronomists since waterhemp was found in the province in the fall of 2016. Suspect plant specimen collected from a soybean field in the RM of Taché was verified as waterhemp by staff with the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Collection of Vascular plants in Ottawa.  Waterhemp occurs in neighbouring states and provinces, including Minnesota, North Dakota and Ontario.

Both species thrive in agricultural fields where they compete with crops for nutrients, moisture and light. Waterhemp has no hairs on its stem or leaves, which can be used to distinguish it from redroot pigweed when plants are small.  The lack of hairs give waterhemp leaves a ‘glossy’ look unlike that of the ‘dull’ green leaves of redroot pigweed.  Also, waterhemp leaves are lanceolate in shape (longer than they are wide) compared to the more ovate leaves of redroot pigweed.  Colour is not a reliable identifying characteristic since both species can be green, red or variations of the two colours.

Mature waterhemp plants tend to be more branched than redroot pigweed. And unlike redroot pigweed, which has male and female flowers on the same plant, waterhemp has separate male and female plants.  Waterhemp inflorescence are long, slender and vary in colour compared with the compact, prickly inflorescence of redroot pigweed.  Like most pigweeds, waterhemp is a prolific seed producer with up to a million seeds per plant (under ideal conditions).

Waterhemp populations resistant to group 2, group 9 (glyphosate) and group 2+9 exist throughout the US, including Minnesota and North Dakota, and in Ontario. Seed from one of the plants found in Manitoba have been sent to Ontario for resistance testing.

Information on waterhemp will be added to Manitoba Agriculture’s weeds webpage shortly (http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/weeds/) and will be included at the Weed Seedling Identification Day (hosted by the Manitoba Weed Supervisors Association).  Manitoba Agriculture staff will conduct a waterhemp surveillance program in and around the RM of Taché in 2017.

Additional information on waterhemp is available at: http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/BP/gwc-13.pdf (excluding herbicide recommendations).

waterhemp-tone-ag-consulting

Photo: Waterhemp in Manitoba, Tone Ag Consulting

Submitted by: Jeanette Gaultier, Provincial Weed Specialist, Manitoba Agriculture

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

Many Options to View Current & Past Editions of Seed Manitoba

Did you know you can view the 2017 edition of Seed Manitoba, as well as past editions, on www.seedmb.ca?  Well, you can!

Flip-view digital editions of the current guide (2017), as well as the six most recent editions, are available at http://www.seedmb.ca/digital-edition/.

digital-editions-screenshot-of-seedmb

Screen shot of digital editions of Seed Manitoba on www.seedmb.ca

Also, full PDF versions are available at http://www.seedmb.ca/digital-edition/pdf-editions-and-separate-section-pdfs/ where you can download the entire edition, or the commodity section you are most interested in.

pdf-versions-of-seedmb

Screen shot of PDF versions of Seed Manitoba on www.seedmb.ca

Seed Manitoba is a collaboration of Manitoba Agriculture, Manitoba Seed Growers’ Association and Farm Business Communication.

Respond
Have a follow-up question?
,

A Look at FDK & DON in Winter Wheat Varieties

In 2014, a study was initiated to evaluate how winter wheat varieties being tested post-registration by MCVET respond to fusarium head blight under non-misted conditions (natural infection) by assessing harvested samples for fusarium damaged kernels (FDK) and deoxynivalenol (DON) accumulation. The results from 2014 can be found here: Winter Wheat Varieties Response to Fusarium Head Blight in 2014 and Effect of Fusarium Head Blight on Winter Wheat Varieties in 2014.

2015 Results. With funding from Winter Cereals Manitoba Inc., the study continued in 2015. Composite samples of eight registered winter wheat varieties were collected from the three replicates at four MCVET sites: Carman, Hamiota, Melita & Minto.  BioVision Seed Labs in Winnipeg, Manitoba conducted the analysis. The level of FDK (%) was measured as per the Official Grain Grading Guide of the Canadian Grain Commission. The accumulation of DON (ppm) was measured using the ELISA test method.

The variety Emerson, rated as Resistant (R), had lower levels of FDK and DON compared to the other varieties (see Figure 1).  Some varieties rated as Susceptible (S) consistently showed higher FHB severity, FDK and DON levels across all sites. However, data also shows there is variability of performance within the five resistance categories of Resistant (R) to Susceptible (S).

Figure 1: Average Levels of Fusarium Damaged Kernel (FDK) and Deoxynivalenol (DON) by Winter Wheat Variety at Four MCVET Sites in 2015

2015-average-don-fdk-at-four-mcvet-winter-wheat-sites

Figure 2: Fusarium Damaged Kernel (FDK) and Deoxynivalenol (DON) Comparisons at Four MCVET Sites for Winter Wheat Varieties in 2015.

2015-fdk-don-comparisons-at-four-mcvet-winter-wheat-sites

 

2016 Results. In the 2016 Manitoba Fusarium Head Blight Survey, the average FHB index for winter wheat was 2.7% which was slightly below the 10-year-average (3.1%).  Winter Cereals Manitoba Inc. again is providing funding to have the MCVET winter wheat varieties tested for FDK and DON. Analysis is currently underway and results should be available for the Winter Cereals Manitoba Inc. Annual General Meeting on March 15, 2017.

Summary. Extensive research over the past 20 years shows using multiple management options, including crop rotation, fungicide application and variety selection, is the best way to mitigate the risk of FHB. Although FHB infection will always be highly influenced by environment, the first step is to select varieties with improved resistance and then use them in combination with other management strategies. In years where there is higher disease pressure, such as 2014, variety selection will be critical to minimize the impact of FHB on yield and quality. However, under high disease pressure yield and quality loss due to FHB can still happen in varieties that have improved resistance as resistance does not equal immunity.

Remember, caution must be used with one year of data, as presented here. Using data derived over two or more growing seasons over multiple sites is always recommended to provide the best indicator of variety performance.

Submitted by:  Pam de Rocquigny, Provincial Cereal Crops Specialist, Manitoba Agriculture

Special thanks to: Winter Cereals Manitoba Inc. for providing funding to conduct FDK & DON analysis; BioVision Seed Labs who conducted the FDK and DON analysis; Manitoba Crop Variety Evaluation Team (MCVET) & contractors who provided the harvested samples.

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

Updated Cereal/Oilseed/Pulse Maps for Yield, Acreage and Seeding Date Now Available

Manitoba Agriculture’s Crop Industry Branch and MASC has updated and posted yield, acreage and seeding date maps for cereal, oilseed and pulse crops at https://www.masc.mb.ca/masc.nsf/mmpp_index.html

The maps can be found at the link above under the heading “Thematic Crop Maps“‎. Time frame in most cases is 2006 to 2015 (10 year), but 2011 to 2015 is also available for soybean, feed wheat and corn to reflect the acreage changes that occurred in the past 5 years.

Many thanks to Doug Wilcox‎ from MASC for the database, and Les Mitchell and Natalie Azure from the Crop Industry Branch who developed and created the maps for this project.

 

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

SEED MANITOBA 2017 NOW AVAILABLE!

picture1SEED MANITOBA 2017, the Variety Selection and Growers Source Guide, is a collaborative effort between Manitoba Agriculture, the Manitoba Seed Growers’ Association and the Manitoba Cooperator.  SEED MANITOBA remains one of the best sources for unbiased variety performance information with yield and quality information collected at various sites across Manitoba.

SEED MANITOBA 2017 will be available:

  • Local seed growers
  • Subscribers of the Manitoba Cooperator
  • Local Manitoba Agriculture Offices

 

A digital edition of SEED MANITOBA 2017 will also be available at www.seedmb.ca

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

Summary of Presentations from the International Congress of Entomology, September 25-30, 2016

Submitted & Summarized by: John Gavloski, Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture

The following link provides highlights from some of the presentations most pertinent to agronomists and farmers in Manitoba. Please contact me for further information on these presentations or meetings. Due to there being concurrent sessions at these meetings, there were many more presentations than what is presented in this summary. These were selected because of their relevance or potential interest to those working in agriculture in Manitoba. I have categorized the presentation reported by commodity group or discipline.

The information presented is a combination of material from oral presentations, poster presentations and provided as abstracts for the various symposiums. Many presentations have multiple authors, however only the presenting author is reported in this summary.

http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/pubs/int-congress-of-entomology-2016-summary.pdf

Visit the Insect Pages of our Manitoba Agriculture website at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/index.html

 

 

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

Summary of Insects on Crops in Manitoba in 2016

A “Summary of Insects on Crops in Manitoba in 2016” is posted on the Manitoba Agriculture insect page at the link http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/pubs/2016-summary.pdf

This report is based partially on observation by myself and my summer assistant. A large part of this information, however, is based on observations and reports from agronomists, farmers, farm production extension specialists, extension coordinators, and others who contributed information over the season. This information was helpful in providing timely updates on where and when insects were of concern throughout the season, and it is a compilation of this data that makes up this summary. Thank you very much to those who contributed information over the growing season.

Note also that the information in the summary is what has been observed personally or reported, and may not be complete in many instances. Although we encourage the reporting of information on insect populations and control to make our weekly updates as complete and useful as possible, some areas of high insect populations and areas where control took place may not have been reported.

I hope this information is useful in your winter planning and preparations for next year

Submitted by: John Gavloski, Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture

Visit the Insect Pages of our Manitoba Agriculture website at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/crops/insects/index.html

Manitoba Agriculture on Twitter: @MBGovAg
Manitoba Agriculture on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ManitobaAgriculture
Manitoba Agriculture website: www.manitoba.ca/agriculture

 

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

Getting the Facts on Fusarium Head Blight

Fusarium head blight, or FHB, is a major disease that wheat and other cereal producers deal with each year to varying levels. The conditions in 2016 were conducive for infection in both winter and spring wheat as well as other cereal crops (symptoms were observed in both barley and oats). While 2016 was not the worse year on record for FHB in Manitoba (see post on FHB survey results), levels across the prairies were amongst the highest they have been in recent years.

Manitoba Agriculture has partnered with Alberta Agriculture and Forestry and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture to develop a Q & A series “Getting the Facts on Fusarium Head Blight”. This series will address FHB issues producers faced in the 2016 season as well as issues they are facing regarding infected seed. The answers provided will be a combined effort of the provincial disease specialists with input from researchers at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the University of Saskatchewan, and the University of Manitoba.

If you have a question you would like to see addressed please submit via Crop Chatter or contact your provincial disease specialist.

Submitted by

Holly Derksen, Field Crop Pathologist, Manitoba Agriculture

Barbara Ziesman, Provincial Specialist, Plant Disease, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture

Michael Harding, Research Scientist, Plant Pathology, Alberta Agriculture & Forestry

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

2016 Manitoba Fusarium Head Blight Survey

The following are the results of spring and winter wheat fields surveyed for Fusarium head blight (FHB) by Manitoba Agriculture Staff. Fusarium head blight was observed in nearly every field surveyed (97% of winter wheat fields surveyed and 93% of spring wheat fields surveyed). The average FHB index for winter wheat in 2016 was 2.7% which was slightly below the 10-year-average (3.1%). The average FHB index for spring wheat in 2016 was 2.4% which was slightly above the 10-year-average (2.2%).

Winter wheat:

FHB was observed in 30/31 fields surveyed.

Region # Fields Surveyed Average Incidence Average Severity Average FHB Index
Central 13 18% 19% 3.6%
Eastern/Interlake 13 11% 16% 2.6%
Southwest 5 6% 11% 0.6%
MANITOBA 31 13% 16% 2.7%

*No winter wheat fields in the Northwest region were surveyed

Spring wheat:

FHB was observed in 50/54 fields surveyed.

Region # Fields Surveyed Average Incidence Average Severity Average FHB Index
Central 17 29% 12% 3.9%
Eastern/Interlake 17 8% 11% 1.1%
Northwest 10 7% 8% 0.7%
Southwest 10 23% 19% 3.9%
MANITOBA 54 17% 12% 2.4%

 

Submitted by Holly Derksen, Field Crop Pathologist, Manitoba Agriculture

Respond
Have a follow-up question?

The Slow Dry Down & Harvest of the 2016 Grain Corn Crop

Modified from a previous Crop Chatter post made November 18, 2014.

November is here and there remains grain corn to be harvested in some parts of Manitoba. In some cases, moisture contents are still higher than wanted or wet field conditions are hampering progress. But with winter approaching, many are opting to harvest under the less than ideal conditions.

What are normal dry down rates in corn? The best dry down rates are in September. Under good weather conditions from the mid to end of September, dry down rates can vary from 0.75 to 1.0% per day (can be greater in some cases when conditions are warm, sunny and dry, or zero on cool, rainy days!). Into early October, dry down ranges from 0.5% to 0.75% per day. In late October, dry down rate will decrease to less than 0.33% per day. And into November, dry down rate will further decrease to 0.15% per day to negligible amounts.

It is important to keep in mind that moisture loss for any particular day may be higher or lower depending on the temperature, relative humidity, sunshine, wind or rain conditions that day.

However, regardless of kernel moisture content in November, if left standing the crop can dry down throughout the winter months to moisture contents below 20%.

Potential Yield Loss.  If the crop remains out longer than anticipated and into the winter months, potential yield loss will depend on many factors, including stalk strength, ear drop, snow cover or wildlife damage. Ear drop will vary by hybrid and environmental conditions as well as the amount of grain on the ear (smaller ears should stay attached better than larger ears).  Stalk strength should also be considered when evaluating harvest timing (and this includes assessments of stalk rots). Compromised stalk strength could lead to increased stalk breakage, resulting in lost yield.

If winter conditions are cool with minimal snowfall, then corn will continue to dry and can be harvested throughout the winter.

If you do find yourself in the position of needing/wanting to overwinter your corn, please touch base with your local MASC agent.

Submitted by:  Pam de Rocquigny, Provincial Cereal Crops Specialist, Manitoba Agriculture

Manitoba Agriculture on Twitter: @MBGovAg
Manitoba Agriculture on YouTube: www.youtube.com/ManitobaAgriculture
Manitoba Agriculture website: www.manitoba.ca/agriculture

 

Respond
Have a follow-up question?